Refactoring CSS files: merged MemberDetail styles into global app.module.css #2532
Conversation
….css and updated component references
….css and updated component references
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the removal of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
617-627: Consider using CSS Grid for better layout control.The current flex-based layout could be enhanced using CSS Grid for more complex layouts and better responsiveness.
.mainpage { - display: flex; - flex-direction: row; + display: grid; + grid-template-columns: auto 1fr; + gap: 1rem; } .sidebar { z-index: 0; padding-top: 5px; margin: 0; height: 100%; + position: sticky; + top: 0; }
916-938: Optimize loader animation performance.The loader animation could benefit from using transform instead of border for better performance.
.loader { margin: 60px auto; margin-top: 35vh !important; font-size: 10px; position: relative; text-indent: -9999em; - border-top: 1.1em solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2); - border-right: 1.1em solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2); - border-bottom: 1.1em solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2); - border-left: 1.1em solid #febc59; + background: conic-gradient( + #febc59 0deg, + rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2) 45deg, + rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2) 360deg + ); -webkit-transform: translateZ(0); -ms-transform: translateZ(0); transform: translateZ(0); -webkit-animation: load8 1.1s infinite linear; animation: load8 1.1s infinite linear; }src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx (2)
Line range hint
71-86: Consider using a custom hook for form state management.The form state management logic could be extracted into a custom hook for better reusability and separation of concerns.
// useFormState.ts const useFormState = (initialState) => { const [formState, setFormState] = useState(initialState); const [isUpdated, setIsUpdated] = useState(false); const handleChange = async (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement | HTMLSelectElement>) => { const { name, value } = e.target; setFormState(prev => ({ ...prev, [name]: value })); setIsUpdated(true); }; const resetForm = (values) => { setFormState(values); setIsUpdated(false); }; return { formState, isUpdated, handleChange, resetForm }; };
Line range hint
246-280: Add error boundary for image handling.The image upload handling could benefit from an error boundary to gracefully handle file-related errors.
const handleImageError = (error: Error) => { toast.error('Failed to process image. Please try again.'); console.error('Image processing error:', error); }; try { const base64 = await convertToBase64(file); setFormState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, image: base64 as string, })); } catch (error) { handleImageError(error as Error); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.node-version(0 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .node-version
- src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM: Style import path updated correctly.
The import path has been updated to reflect the new location of the CSS module.
Line range hint 127-166: Optimize GraphQL query with field selection.
The USER_DETAILS query might be fetching more fields than necessary. Consider selecting only the required fields to improve performance.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the GraphQL query and its usage.
Let me try a different approach to find the GraphQL query definition and its usage.
Let me gather one final piece of information to see all the fields being used in the MemberDetail component.
Based on the information gathered, I can now provide a final response regarding the GraphQL query optimization concern.
GraphQL query fields are appropriately utilized in the component.
The code analysis shows that the USER_DETAILS query fields are actively used throughout the MemberDetail component:
- User profile fields: firstName, lastName, email, image, gender, birthDate, educationGrade, employmentStatus, maritalStatus
- Contact information: phone.mobile, address (line1, state, city, countryCode)
- App profile: appLanguageCode, pluginCreationAllowed, adminFor, isSuperAdmin
- Events: eventsAttended with _id
- Tags: tagsAssignedWith with edges containing node data
All queried fields are being used for:
- Form state management and display
- User role determination (Admin/Super Admin)
- Events attended list
- Tags management
- Profile image display
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check GraphQL query field usage
# Search for field usage in the component
rg -A 2 "userData\." src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx
# Search for the query definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const USER_DETAILS = gql`
$$$
`'
Length of output: 446
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all userData usages to understand required fields
rg "userData\." src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx
# Find the GraphQL query definition
rg -B 2 -A 20 "USER_DETAILS = gql" src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx
# Look for any other components that might be using this query
rg "USER_DETAILS" --type typescript
Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the GraphQL query with more context and without file type restriction
rg -B 2 -A 20 "USER_DETAILS.*gql"
# Search for userData usages with more context
rg -B 2 -A 5 "userData\." src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.tsx
# Find all files that might be using USER_DETAILS
rg "USER_DETAILS"
Length of output: 4032
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get a complete view of the component to see all userData field usages
rg -l "MemberDetail" | xargs cat
# Alternative approach to find all userData usages
ast-grep --pattern 'userData.$$$'
Length of output: 86731
package.json
Outdated
| @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ | |||
| "jest": "^27.4.5", | |||
| "jest-localstorage-mock": "^2.4.19", | |||
| "jest-location-mock": "^2.0.0", | |||
| "jest-preview": "^0.3.1", | |||
| "jest-preview": "^0.2.3", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Downgrade to jest-preview v0.2.3 requires attention
Based on the release history, downgrading from v0.3.1 to v0.2.3 would miss out on several important improvements:
- Bug fixes for SASS and Linux reload functionality (v0.2.8)
- PostCSS support (v0.3.0)
- LESS CSS support (v0.3.1)
- SVG import as ReactComponent support (v0.3.0)
- Various documentation and example improvements
No security vulnerabilities were found, but the downgrade skips multiple feature releases and bug fixes. Consider keeping v0.3.1 unless there's a specific compatibility issue with the newer version.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the jest-preview package downgrade.
The jest-preview package has been downgraded from ^0.3.1 to ^0.2.3. This could potentially miss out on bug fixes or improvements from the newer version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes and security advisories between jest-preview versions
# Check the changelog or releases for breaking changes
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "nvh95", name: "jest-preview") {
releases(first: 5, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
nodes {
name
description
tagName
isPrerelease
publishedAt
}
}
}
}'
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "jest-preview") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 7784
| .form_wrapper { | ||
| margin-top: 27px; | ||
| top: 50%; | ||
| left: 50%; | ||
| transform: translate(-50%, -50%); | ||
| position: absolute; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| flex-direction: column; | ||
| width: 30%; | ||
| padding: 40px 30px; | ||
| background: #ffffff; | ||
| border-color: #e8e5e5; | ||
| border-width: 5px; | ||
| border-radius: 10px; | ||
| max-height: 86vh; | ||
| overflow: auto; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .form_wrapper form { | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| align-items: left; | ||
| justify-content: left; | ||
| flex-direction: column; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve form wrapper accessibility and responsiveness.
The form wrapper uses absolute positioning which can be problematic for accessibility and responsiveness. Consider using a more flexible approach.
.form_wrapper {
- margin-top: 27px;
- top: 50%;
- left: 50%;
- transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
- position: absolute;
+ margin: 2rem auto;
+ position: relative;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
- width: 30%;
+ width: min(90%, 30rem);
padding: 40px 30px;
background: #ffffff;
border-color: #e8e5e5;
border-width: 5px;
border-radius: 10px;
max-height: 86vh;
overflow: auto;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .form_wrapper { | |
| margin-top: 27px; | |
| top: 50%; | |
| left: 50%; | |
| transform: translate(-50%, -50%); | |
| position: absolute; | |
| display: flex; | |
| flex-direction: column; | |
| width: 30%; | |
| padding: 40px 30px; | |
| background: #ffffff; | |
| border-color: #e8e5e5; | |
| border-width: 5px; | |
| border-radius: 10px; | |
| max-height: 86vh; | |
| overflow: auto; | |
| } | |
| .form_wrapper form { | |
| display: flex; | |
| align-items: left; | |
| justify-content: left; | |
| flex-direction: column; | |
| } | |
| .form_wrapper { | |
| margin: 2rem auto; | |
| position: relative; | |
| display: flex; | |
| flex-direction: column; | |
| width: min(90%, 30rem); | |
| padding: 40px 30px; | |
| background: #ffffff; | |
| border-color: #e8e5e5; | |
| border-width: 5px; | |
| border-radius: 10px; | |
| max-height: 86vh; | |
| overflow: auto; | |
| } | |
| .form_wrapper form { | |
| display: flex; | |
| align-items: left; | |
| justify-content: left; | |
| flex-direction: column; | |
| } |
| .activeBtn { | ||
| width: 100%; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| color: #fff; | ||
| border: 1px solid #000; | ||
| background-color: #31bb6b; | ||
| transition: 0.5s; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .activeBtn:hover { | ||
| color: #fff; | ||
| background: #23864c; | ||
| transition: 0.5s; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .inactiveBtn { | ||
| width: 100%; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| color: #31bb6b; | ||
| border: 1px solid #31bb6a60; | ||
| background-color: #fff; | ||
| transition: 0.5s; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .inactiveBtn:hover { | ||
| color: #fff; | ||
| background: #31bb6b; | ||
| transition: 0.5s; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate button styles to reduce duplication.
The activeBtn and inactiveBtn classes share many properties. Consider using CSS custom properties for better maintainability.
+:root {
+ --btn-primary-color: #31bb6b;
+ --btn-hover-color: #23864c;
+ --btn-transition: 0.5s;
+}
.btn-base {
+ width: 100%;
+ display: flex;
+ border: 1px solid;
+ transition: var(--btn-transition);
}
.activeBtn {
- width: 100%;
- display: flex;
+ composes: btn-base;
color: #fff;
- border: 1px solid #000;
- background-color: #31bb6b;
- transition: 0.5s;
+ border-color: #000;
+ background-color: var(--btn-primary-color);
}
.inactiveBtn {
- width: 100%;
- display: flex;
+ composes: btn-base;
color: #31bb6b;
- border: 1px solid #31bb6a60;
+ border-color: var(--btn-primary-color);
background-color: #fff;
- transition: 0.5s;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Please submit your PRs against our
develop-postgresbranch. To facilitate our reviews, the source and target branches in the PR must be different. The failing test indicates this. Closing. - This PR needs to be closed. The source and target PR branches are the same. This means that our reviewers will not be able to checkout the changes and test on their systems using this methodology which will cause a rejection error:
- Please create a new branch in your local repository with the changes
- Make sure the branch name is named differently from the target branch (
develop) - Resubmit your PR
You will see that other PRs are using non-develop branch names for this reason
| @@ -1 +0,0 @@ | |||
| v22.7.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your PR has too many unnecessary files that don’t relate to your issue. You can from the PR by running the commands below from the root directory of the repository
git add -u
git reset HEAD path/to/file
git commit
Please apply these changes to this file.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring CSS files: merged MemberDetail styles into global app.module.css and updated component references
Issue Number:
Fixes #2511
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
It is my first PR on Palisadoes Foundation.
Looking forward to contribute more and more to this organistation.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
jest-previewpackage version..node-versionfile.